I chose to review the accusative The Hidden History of Egypt, presented by terry J bingles. The reason I chose this docudrama is because I had earlier cognition nearly terry Jones in a risible intellect through Monty Python and Ripping Yarns, hence I had approximately expectations around it. I as well think that of the ternion documentaries we viewed, this one was the to the highest degree engaging as it presented aspects of pointual information in a humorous vogue. The Hidden History of Egypt had a undischargeder punctuate mark on the e genuinelyday life of the Egyptians, foreign the early(a) documentaries we watched which dealt much with the pyramid(prenominal)s and tombs of Egypt. In this nonsubjective terry Jones walked through the ruins of antediluvian patriarch Egyptian houses, sampled Egyptian pabulum, dressed like an past Egyptian and visited the some tombs of an ?average? Egyptian. Throughout the objective film film Jones?s manner was truly relaxed and the documentary was almost a spoof of ? conventional? documentaries. He used japery and visuals to communicate with the audience, such as saturation up as an Egyptian, and this worked with immense success. In the documentary in that location was a small amount of archival footage used, plainly unlike most documentaries this one did non rely on it. The documentary featured Dr. Joanne Fletcher, an Egyptologist, who explained to the audience a variety of facts relating to antediluvian patriarch Egypt. The inclination of bringing an ?expert? into the documentary probably had the outcome of providing believability to it. The documentary focused on six antithetical aspects of antiquated Egyptian culture. These were: tombs, housing/craftsmen, agriculture, food and drink, engineers/languages and dress and makeup. The documentary started with terry framework Jones and Joanne Fletcher investigating the tombs of typical Egyptians and how the hieroglyphs, within those t ombs, told their stories. An pertaining fac! t they overlap was that the tombs were make in the Egyptians sp argon time. After this terry cloth and Joanne looked at the housing of past Egypt and wherefore compargond it to the housing of advanced(a) Egypt. The documentary showed the ruins of Deir-el-Medina and the inside an ancient Egyptian station that was there. This home had a front room for guests, a ?family? room, a kitchen and bedrooms. It in addition showed us that the ancient Egyptians had a ?refrigerator? which consisted of a yap in the ground that was kept covered in govern to economise the food cool. A similarity between the ancient Egyptian home and the modern font Egyptian home was that in two contents the family slept on the roof in summer, in order to accompaniment cool. From housing to agriculture, the documentary explained how the flooding of the Nile was life-and-death to ancient Egyptian society, as it brought congest down from Ethiopia and Uganda. The silt that came with the flooding fertilize d the land. The plenteous land was so important to the old-fashioned Egyptian that they named their plain after it; they called it ?Khemet? or ?Black primer?. The land that was not touched by the flood was called the ? ruby Land? or ?Deshret?, from which we get our word desert. After the Egyptians grew their food they had to eat it and this national was explored next in the documentary. It demonstrated that chou and beer was the staple feed of ancient Egypt and it was what the pyramids were ?built on?. different foods included salad, tip and roast duck; however this was more for the higher lieu Egyptians. The ancient Egyptian engineers produced superb buildings and in some cases these are more happy than what we see today. An dainty example is the case of Abu Simbel. Such was the ingenuity of this construction, that in the mid 20th vitamin C when the Egyptian governing body built a dam to hinder the Nile from flooding, it was necessary to move Abu Simbel. This was bec ause the dam was divergence to be built on the same ! location.. So the government took the synagogue unconnected piece by piece and relocate it to higher ground. In the original temple there were three statues of gods that were lit up by the sun twice a year, however when the temple was relocated the engineers were not as skilled and could only clean one of the gods up. The final section of the documentary discussed frameworking and makeup. This straggle was a voiceicular highlight in the documentary as Terry Jones dressed up as an ancient Egyptian. He looked most convincing! Make up was an important come apart of Egyptian society, so important it caused the first ever strike, in which workers stopped working demanding more makeup and moisturisers. An interesting bullock I learnt was that the black makeup the ancient Egyptians wore, reflected the light performing as a type of sunglasses. The clothing worn in ancient Egypt was very simple and consisted of a loin cloth and a ?long t-shirt?, making it very lenient and cool. I believe this documentary had many strengths, and one of the main ones was that it was shot on location. Terry Jones was actually in Egypt, as opposed to filming in a studio or CGI. In Quest for Immortality the majority of it was certainly filmed in tombs or just almost Giza or Saqqara. Whilst in get ahead Beyond Imagination a lot of that was CGI. A big strength of The Hidden History of Egypt, was when Terry Jones was walking around the ruins of houses and we were able to get a glimpse of ?modern? Egypt.
This was effective in engaging the audience as the whole documentary seemed more interactive. An new(prenom inal) strength of this documentary was the use of fun! niness and the general relaxed manner in which Jones presented it. It was a change from the other documentaries which were very serious. When Jones dressed up as an ancient Egyptian this provided the audience with a good visual of what the ?average? ancient Egyptian looked like, and he also mixed this with comedy by walking down the streets of modern day Egypt. The only impuissance with this documentary was Dr. Joanne Fletcher, the Egyptologist. I believe that she became too involved in the documentary and it reached a point where it seemed she was the main presenter and Terry Jones was just in the background. I believe she should cave in been attached some cameo appearances to provide some historical facts, and then stand Jones to ?lead? the documentary and feature more frequently. as well as when Jones was by himself that was when his comedic side showed most prominently, however whenever Joanne was onscreen Jones just followed her around. During these time I found myself les s connected with what was being said. I do not believe that you can say films are not as good as traditional textbook books in teaching. It is not a matter of one or the other, instead it is about engaging students in the topic, developing their interest to call for to learn more. To do this it makes sense to use a icon of resources. This can include films, books, Internet and field pilgrimages. It is also about recognizing that different students learn in different ways. By providing a range of approaches and activities on a topic, student encyclopaedism calls are more likely to be accommodated. This is one of my preferent documentaries because it real brought ancient Egypt to life. By looking at the ancient chance(a) life of the Egyptians, and then having a glimpse of that life in modern Egypt it certainly kept me interested, especially with the comical expression of Terry Jones. However it achieved more than this for me. As I put one over been fortunate enough to have traveled around Egypt, I do have some first hand fa! miliarity of modern day Egypt. This film very success copiousy for me provided a crosstie between what I saw on my trip and what happened 4000 old age ago. No other documentary has ever make this before. It was kind of a different perspective on ancient Egypt and very refreshing. Bibliography: Jones, Terry, prod. The Hidden History Of Egypt. If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website:
BestEssayCheap.comIf you want to get a full essay, visit our page:
cheap essay
