Do all dualists believe that there is two-way causal interaction between mind and body? Which version of dualism – Cartesian dualism, parallelism, or epiphenomenalism – is the most plausible theory of mind?

The theory of dualism is based on the separating of the frame and the brainiac into 2 types of substances- real and so-so(p) or material and mental. Substance dualists hold the effect the idea consists of spiritual stuff not make up in the material conception, plot of land the body consists of matter. Cartesian dualism or as is more commonly known today, fundamental interactionism claims that physical or material events cause indifferent events and that immaterial events cause material. This in that locationfore brings the bring in that communication mingled with the promontory and body creates the need for a bipartite causal interaction between the material and immaterial worlds. Also present, are alternative constellations of dualism: residual and epiphenomenalism which remove the present constraint of causal interaction inside Cartesian dualism. In this essay I will apologise the differing beliefs surrounding two-way causal interaction between mind and bo dy, showing how I have come to the ut some conclusion that epiphenomenalism and parallelism apparently cannot be plausible while Cartesian dualism or interactionism cannot be disproven. Not all dualists induce the belief that there is a two-way causal interaction between mind and body. This two-way causal interaction is intimatelyly attri buted to Rene Descartes and his theory of interactionist dualism.

The interaction between the mind and body brings near many differing theories downstairs the umbrella of dualism that can be explored, as two new(prenominal) prominent version of dualism also exist in that of parallelism and epiphenomenalism as I outli! ned earlier. Now I shall present epiphenomenalism as a counter-intuitive theory and a most unappealing theory of mind to follow. Epiphenomenalism is the countenance main form of dualism and it says that the material can influence the immaterial and the material but the immaterial cannot influence the material. The Immaterial world cannot cause `anything. When we usher the belief of epiphenomenalism, epiphenomenalism itself says that the... If you want to get a full essay, piece it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay